Shaking things up in state and local tax
Shaking things up in state and local tax
On October 18, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued its decision in Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, in which the court held that the state’s flat $3 million cap on net operating loss carryforwards violates the state constitution’s Uniformity Clause. Key considerations from the case include:
…
Eversheds Sutherland SALT releases the seventh edition of its SALT Scoreboard, a quarterly publication that tracks significant state tax litigation and controversy developments. This edition of the SALT Scoreboard highlights developments regarding the sales taxation of drop shipments and the inclusion of entities in a combined report. Also included is a Spotlight on cases involving the United States…
By Alla Raykin and Charlie Kearns
The US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the Tax Injunction Act (TIA) barred a religious nonprofit from bringing a federal suit over Tennessee’s denial of a retroactive property tax exemption. In Islamic Ctr. of Nashville v. Tennessee, the Islamic Center of Nashville sought…
By Huy “Mike” Le and Andrew Appleby
The New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) held that the Department’s assessment of two non-admitted German insurance companies violated the United States-Germany Tax Treaty’s anti-discrimination clause and the US Constitution’s Foreign Commerce Clause.
The alien non-admitted non-life insurance companies had no premiums from sources in the United…
By Mike Kerman and Jonathan Feldman
The Delaware Chancery Court held that a town’s $27,000 building permit “fee” was in substance a tax that could not be levied against a tax-exempt water and sewer authority. The town assessed the fee upon the water and sewer authority before it would issue a permit to construct a…
By Charles Capouet and Jonathan Feldman
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that an in-state wholesaler was required to collect and remit sales tax on drop shipment sales made to Massachusetts customers. A drop shipment is a transaction in which an in-state customer purchases a product from an out-of-state retailer which then orders the product…
By Liz Cha and Open Weaver Banks
The North Carolina Supreme Court affirmed the North Carolina Business Court’s decision that Fidelity Bank was precluded from deducting “market discount income” from US bonds for North Carolina corporate income tax purposes. Fidelity Bank acquired US government bonds at a discount, held these bonds until maturity, and earned…
By Chelsea Marmor and Charlie Kearns
The Alabama Tax Tribunal (Tribunal) affirmed the Alabama Department of Revenue’s (DOR) assessment that denied Credit Suisse Boston USA Inc.’s (Credit Suisse) deduction for interest expense paid to a related member. Credit Suisse argued that the interest expense payments were exempt from Alabama’s addback requirement because the expense to…
By Dmitrii Gabrielov and Tim Gustafson
The South Carolina Court of Appeals held that all of DIRECTV’s South Carolina customer subscription receipts were properly sourced to the state for purposes of determining DIRECTV’s corporate income tax apportionment factor due to the location of its satellite signal delivery. South Carolina’s apportionment statute requires a taxpayer to…
On Aug. 28, 2017, in California Cannabis Coalition v. City of Upland, the California Supreme Court held local taxes imposed by taxpayers via initiative are subject to less stringent requirements than taxes imposed by local governments pursuant to Proposition 218. In their article for Law 360, Eversheds Sutherland attorneys Eric Coffill and Robert…
