By Sahang-Hee Hahn and Timothy Gustafson
The Indiana Department of Revenue required an out-of-state clothing company and its subsidiary to file a combined Indiana corporate income tax return, determining that the taxpayer’s transfer pricing study was insufficient to establish that its intercompany transactions were conducted at arm’s length. The taxpayer was the parent of a
With 200+ posts on the most important state and local tax developments across the nation, the Sutherland SALT Shaker mobile app is the best way to stay up-to-date on the latest in state and local tax.
With updates added continually, state tax professionals now have a go-to source for state-by-state, tax-by-tax, issue-by-issue coverage and commentary
By Ted Friedman and Prentiss Willson
The Indiana Department of Revenue determined that affiliated entities of an out-of-state manufacturing corporation were not unitary. The corporation conducted marketing operations as one business segment and production operations as a second business segment. The corporation included its marketing entities in its Indiana consolidated return. On audit, Department staff
By Stephanie Do and Andrew Appleby
The Indiana Department of Revenue determined that an out-of-state wireless communications equipment wholesaler’s in-state business activities were protected by P.L. 86-272, and therefore, the wholesaler did not have nexus for Indiana corporate income tax purposes. The wholesaler’s in-state activities were limited to shipping products to Indiana customers by common
By Nicole Boutros and Pilar Mata
The Texas Comptroller determined that a taxpayer’s “digitizing” services provided to oil and gas industry clients were taxable data processing services for Texas sales and use tax purposes. The services at issue consisted of taking well log data from the client; analyzing, manipulating and interpreting such data; and providing
Click here to read our March 2014 posts or read each article by clicking on the title. A printable PDF is also available here. To read our commentary on the latest state and local tax developments as they are published, be sure to download the Sutherland SALT Shaker mobile app.
We hope you enjoy this very special edition of the Sutherland SALT Shaker newsletter.
In this issue:
By Madison Barnett and Andrew Appleby
The Florida Department of Revenue determined that a company providing television viewing data and analytics services must source its receipts from such services to the location of its customers, despite (1) the state’s majority costs of performance souring rule and (2) that the taxpayer appeared to incur the majority
Today, the Maryland Court of Appeals held that Maryland may tax out-of-state Delaware holding companies that license patents to their parent company, which was doing business in Maryland. Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury and Future Value, Inc. v. Comptroller of the Treasury. The ramifications of this decision are significant because
By David Pope and Pilar Mata
The New York Attorney General’s office posted a press release on March 14, 2014 announcing that Lantheus Medical Imaging (Lantheus) and Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Lantheus’s former parent, agreed to a $6.2 million settlement for a claim filed pursuant to New York’s False Claims Act (FCA). Under New York’s FCA
