In response to numerous inquiries, the Chicago Departments of Finance and Law issued an Information Bulletin on their application of nexus to Chicago taxes in light of Wayfair v. South Dakota, 585 U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 2080 (2018). Illinois has adopted an economic nexus standard by which out-of-state retailers making sales of tangible
A Per Curiam Affirmance by the New Jersey Supreme Court of the Appellate Division Insurance Premium Tax Decision
In a per curiam opinion, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed an insurance premium tax (IPT) decision of the Appellate Division “substantially for the reasons expressed” in the Appellate Division’s opinion. The New Jersey Appellate Division held that New Jersey’s IPT for self-procured insurance coverage is based only on the risks insured in the state,
Your losses may not be lost: Delaware NOL limitation violates state constitution
The Delaware Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the taxpayer finding that the Division of Revenue’s limitation on net operating losses violated the state constitution’s uniformity clause and that the Division improperly limited the amount of separate company NOL the taxpayer could claim on its Delaware income tax return to the amount of
SALT Scoreboard – Third Quarter 2020
This is the third edition of the Eversheds Sutherland SALT Scoreboard for 2020. Since 2016, we have tallied the results of significant taxpayer wins and losses and analyzed those results.
View our Eversheds Sutherland SALT Scoreboard results from the third quarter of 2020 now!
Tough cheese: Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission clarifies the scope of property tax manufacturing exemption
The Wisconsin Tax Appeals Commission recently clarified the applicability of the state’s property tax exemption for machinery, tools, and patterns (“MTP”) under Wis. Stat. § 70.111(27), which took effect in 2018. At issue in this appeal was which of a taxpayer’s property items were eligible for the exemption, which applies to all MTP unless the
California Property Tax and LLC Tax Decisions
In this episode we discuss two recent California decisions, including a Court of Appeal decision concerning property tax escape assessments (Prang v. Los Angeles Cnty. Assessment Appeals Bd., Case No. B301194 (Cal. Ct. App. Aug. 27, 2020) and an Office of Tax Appeals decision concerning nexus for the state’s LLC tax. (In
The not so great escape: California limitation on retroactive property tax assessment did not apply where notice was not filed.
A California Court of Appeal found that because the taxpayer did not file proper notice with the California Board of Equalization (BOE), the limitation on the number of years the county assessor can levy retroactive escape assessments did not apply. The taxpayer’s 2006 merger constituted a change in ownership triggering reporting requirements to the BOE.
Merely deriving receipts from New Jersey sources does not create nexus for Corporation Business Tax purposes
On September, 9, 2020, the New Jersey Appellate Division ruled against the taxpayer in Preserve II, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, No. A-1331-17T3. On its face, the decision looks like a disappointing taxpayer loss because the court upheld the determination that a corporation was subject to the New Jersey Corporation Business Tax (CBT)
California Supreme Court Denies Review in Local Tax Simple vs. Super-Majority Vote Case
On September 9, 2020, the California Supreme Court denied review of the opinion of the First District Court of Appeal in City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons Interested in the Matter of Proposition C, which held a voter-initiated local special tax may pass with only a simple majority. With appeals currently
Eversheds Sutherland files amicus curiae brief on behalf of COST in Fresno Measure P case
Eversheds Sutherland has filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the 550 members of the Council On State Taxation (COST) on the important issue of whether imposition of certain local special taxes in California requires a two-thirds vote by the California electorate, or a simple majority. City of Fresno v. Fresno Building Healthy Communities