On February 12, 2026, Congress has passed a joint “disapproval” resolution for D.C.’s recent bill that decoupled from many of the tax provisions in the federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The joint resolution is now headed to President Donald Trump for signature. This means that the Act’s decoupling legislation has been repealed. To the
Washington DC
D.C. Tax Revision Commission to no longer pursue business activities tax proposal; Engage in further research
On October 9, 2024, the D.C. Tax Revision Commission met to finalize their tax recommendations to the D.C. Council and Mayor. However, the Commission did not reach a consensus and instead opted to perform additional research.
The D.C. Tax Revision Commission’s last activity was to issue a Revised Chairman’s Mark in July 2024. That document…
Legal Alert: DC Tax Revision Commission releases Chairman’s Mark, includes Business Activity Tax and Data Excise Tax
On January 5, 2024, the DC Tax Revision Commission released its “Chairman’s Mark,” which lays out the Commission’s tentative proposals for changes to the District’s tax structure. The Commission released a package of 39 proposals. The total net package is estimated to be revenue neutral.
Read the full Legal Alert here.
Legal Alert: Philadelphia joins the MTC’s Joint Audit Program
The Multistate Tax Commission (MTC)’s 2023 Fall Committee Meetings are off to an exciting start, considering the announcement that Philadelphia will be joining the MTC’s Joint Audit Program. The District of Columbia and Philadelphia are the Program’s only non-state members.
The MTC’s Joint Audit Program provides audit services to the participating taxing authorities. The Program’s…
D.C. Tax Revision Commission considers digital advertising tax and data mining tax
On September 13, 2023, the D.C. Tax Revision Commission met and evaluated over a dozen tax proposals. Most concerning, the Commission discussed the possibility of implementing a digital advertising tax or a data mining tax.
D.C. Tax Revision Commission
The Council of the District of Columbia established the Commission to comprehensively review the District’s tax…
Grounded: D.C. Court of Appeals Holds reversionary interests in land improvements subject to transfer and recordation taxes
On December 29, 2022, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals held that transfer and recordation taxes were due on the portion of consideration from a sale of land and related improvements related to reversionary interests in land improvements. The taxpayers argued that the acquisition consisted of two distinct steps: (1) taxable land sales, via…
Pass/Fail: Evaluating the test for D.C. statutory residency
The District of Columbia occupies a unique position among subnational jurisdictions in the United States given its status as a nonstate, federal enclave. The District’s status allows it to impose individual income tax on only residents under the district clause of the US Constitution, the Home Rule Act of 1973, and implementing statutes that are…
D.C. Attorney General alleges gig-economy company misclassifies workers as independent contractors
D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine announced on October 27th that his office filed suit against a delivery service company, claiming that the company’s workers are employees, not independent contractors.[1] The AG argues that the Company’s delivery drivers “bear all the hallmarks of employee status.”[2] This lawsuit follows another tax-related complaint filed by…
D.C. Attorney General pursues False Claims Act case in individual income tax matter
On August 31, 2022, the D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine announced that his office was pursuing an action against an individual, Michael Saylor, for allegedly owing individual income tax to the District as a resident under a “fraudulent scheme.” The Attorney General is also pursuing a violation of the False Claims Act related to his…
(Pay)rolling with the punches: D.C. Office of Administrative Hearings holds payroll factor denominator limited to financial institution payroll
The District of Columbia Office of Administrative Hearings held that the two financial institution subsidiaries of Petitioner, a credit and charge card issuer company, should have included in their payroll factor denominator only the payroll attributable to the financial institution entities. In other words, when calculating their payroll factor, Petitioner’s financial institution subsidiaries should have…



