A New York State Division of Tax Appeals administrative law judge issued three determinations addressing the tax implications for unauthorized insurance companies, both life and non-life. Significant uncertainty has surrounded New York State’s taxation of unauthorized insurance companies since New York State amended its insurance tax provisions in 2003. The Department of Taxation and Finance
insurance companies
Open for Nonbusiness: Oregon Tax Court Holds Insurance Company’s Gain Was Nonbusiness Income
By Hanish Patel and Open Weaver Banks
The Magistrate Division of the Oregon Tax Court held that an insurance company’s gain from the sale of a subsidiary and income from a holding company both constituted nonbusiness income. The court found that the acquisition and sale of a 40% owned subsidiary that operated as a third-party…
Cell Phone Insurance Not Subject to South Carolina Sales Tax
By Samantha Trencs and Andrew Appleby
A South Carolina administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that cell phone insurance is not subject to South Carolina sales tax even though the wireless provider sells it with taxable communication services.
Alltel provided its wireless customers with an option to purchase insurance for the loss, theft or damage to…
Don’t Retaliate: Tennessee Retaliatory Tax Improperly Included Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Assessments
By Mike Kerman and Andrew Appleby
The Tennessee Supreme Court held that the Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance (Department) improperly imposed retaliatory taxes on Pennsylvania-domiciled insurance companies doing business in Tennessee, because Pennsylvania workers’ compensation assessments were not imposed on Tennessee insurance companies, but rather on the insurance companies’ policyholders. Tennessee Code § 56-4-218…
A Reasonable Result in Massachusetts: Related Party Interest Deductions Allowed Under the Unreasonable Exception
By Stephen Burroughs, Jonathan Feldman and Open Weaver Banks
In a significant taxpayer win, the Massachusetts Appellate Tax Board (ATB) held that intercompany interest payments from a wholly owned subsidiary to Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (MassMutual) were bona fide loans and were deductible for excise tax purposes. The subsidiary (HoldCo) was a holding…
Tennessee Follows Illinois and Expands Direct Placement Tax on Non-Admitted Insurance
Illinois enacted a direct placement tax on non-admitted insurance in 2014. However, there is a strong movement in Illinois to repeal or narrow the tax. Tennessee has now legislatively expanded its direct placement tax on non-admitted insurance, falling in line with many other states, including Illinois. Previously, Tennessee imposed a direct placement…
Taxpayer Victories Are at a Premium: Alabama Court Holds that Business Privilege Tax “Premiums” Include Annuity Considerations
By Stephen Burroughs and Andrew Appleby
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals ruled in favor of an out-of-state life insurance company regarding the calculation of its Alabama net worth tax – the Business Privilege Tax (BPT). The BPT requires an insurance company to calculate its Alabama net worth based on the ratio its Alabama premium…
Massachusetts Governor Proposes Insurance Industry Pass-Through Tax
By Scott Booth and Andrew Appleby
The Massachusetts Governor released his proposed fiscal year 2015 budget, which includes a tax provision that is targeted directly at the insurance industry. Currently, income earned by pass-through entities, such as partnerships, owned by licensed life or property and casualty insurers is excluded from Massachusetts income tax because…
Illinois Gets the Works: Wendy’s Captive Insurance Company Scores Another Win
By Scott Booth and Andrew Appleby
Although states continue to challenge the validity of captive insurance companies, Wendy’s has notched several taxpayer victories. In a win involving Scioto Insurance Company (Scioto), Wendy’s captive insurance company, the Illinois Appellate Court held that Scioto constituted a bona fide insurance company that was properly excluded from Wendy’s combined…
In to Be Out: Indiana Tax Court Rules Captive Insurance Companies Must Be Physically Present to Be Excluded From Combined Report
By Madison Barnett and Timothy Gustafson
In a case involving the exclusion of captive insurance companies from combined reporting groups, the Indiana Tax Court held that a captive must be physically present in Indiana to be “subject to” the insurance premiums tax and therefore exempt from the corporate income tax. The Tax Court initially…