Shaking things up in state and local tax
Shaking things up in state and local tax
By David Pope and Pilar Mata
The Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts determined that a taxpayer was not permitted to elect the Multistate Tax Compact’s (Compact) three-factor apportionment formula. This treatment is consistent with prior Texas Comptroller decisions holding that Texas law requires a single-factor apportionment methodology (see Sutherland SALT’s previous articles on this topic…
By Jessica Kerner and Jack Trachtenberg
The Missouri Department of Revenue determined that a company’s telecommunications services provided to customers on its cloud computer network are subject to sales tax. The company’s cloud network is hosted on servers located outside of the state, and customers access the network through public telecommunications lines and through the…
By Kathryn Pittman and Timothy Gustafson
The Massachusetts Commissioner of Revenue concluded in a letter ruling that a taxpayer’s sales of subscriptions to use its virtual event platform and planning software were subject to sales tax where the use of the software was the object of the transactions. For a flat fee based on length…
By Saabir Kapoor and Prentiss Willson
Virginia’s Tax Commissioner denied a taxpayer’s request for alternative apportionment because the taxpayer did not demonstrate by clear and cogent evidence that the statutory apportionment methodology led to an unconstitutional and inequitable result. The taxpayer, a limited partnership headquartered outside Virginia, sold real estate located in its home state…
By Mary Alexander and Prentiss Willson
The Oklahoma Court of Appeals held that retroactive relief applied to a facially unconstitutional capital gains deduction. The court previously held that the capital gains deduction set forth in 68 O.S. §238(d) discriminated on its face against interstate commerce because the holding period for out-of-state companies was longer than…
By Zachary Atkins and Andrew Appleby
The Arizona Court of Appeals held that Cable One, Inc. was subject to central assessment as a telecommunications company because of its Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service offering. The court found that Cable One, which provided cable television, Internet access and VoIP services, met the statutory definition of…
On June 6, 2013, the Michigan Court of Claims became the second court in the country to hold that the Multistate Tax Compact (the Compact) is a binding multistate compact that cannot be repealed by a separate, subsequent statute. The taxpayer was thus entitled to apportion its income under the former Business Income Tax component…
By Christopher Chang and Jack Trachtenberg
New York’s highest court has ruled that the state violated the Constitution when it retroactively denied tax credits to businesses under the 2009 amendments to the state’s Empire Zone Program. The Empire Zone Program is designed to stimulate private investment and job creation in designated areas throughout the state…
By Jessica Kerner and Timothy Gustafson
The Texas Comptroller determined that a taxpayer’s email advertisement services were telecommunications services subject to the state’s sales tax. The taxpayer, a producer of real estate television shows for homebuilders, maintained a website through which it offered Internet-based services. The two services at issue were the taxpayer’s “Hot Sheet&rdquo…
We invite you to read all of our articles from May 2013 here on our website, or read each article by clicking on the title. If you prefer, you may also view a printable PDF version.
…
