Shaking things up in state and local tax
Shaking things up in state and local tax
By David Pope and Timothy Gustafson
The Virginia Tax Commissioner determined that an out-of-state manufacturer was subject to use tax on “local marketing group” fees charged to its customers because the true object of the transaction was the sale of tangible personal property. The taxpayer manufactured heating, ventilating and air conditioning (HVAC) systems for sale…
Click here to read our August 2013 posts on stateandlocaltax.com or read each article by clicking on the title. If you prefer, you may also read a printable PDF version.
…
By Saabir Kapoor and Timothy Gustafson
The California Court of Appeal, in affirming summary judgment in favor of the City of Los Angeles, concluded that the taxpayer, j2 Global Communications, Inc., did not produce evidence to demonstrate that its purchase of telecommunications services was exempt from the City’s communication users tax (CUT) under the Internet…
By Todd Betor and Andrew Appleby
The Indiana Department of Revenue issued a Letter of Findings denying a taxpayer’s deductions for certain intercompany payments to a subsidiary management company. The taxpayer and its subsidiary management company (Management Co.) entered into an intercompany agreement based on a federal income tax transfer pricing study, which endorsed the…
By Nicole Boutros and Pilar Mata
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit determined that dial-up internet services were taxable local telephone services when analyzing an Internal Revenue Service bankruptcy claim for federal excise taxes (FET). The taxpayer, WorldCom, Inc., purchased central-office-based remote access (COBRA) services from local telephone companies to provide internet…
In its unanimous decision in Elk Hills Power, LLC v. Board of Equalization, the California Supreme Court held that the California State Board of Equalization may not assess the value of intangible Emission Reduction Credits when valuing taxable power plant property. The decision makes clear that property taxation of virtually all intangible assets is…
By Zachary Atkins and Andrew Appleby
An Arizona Department of Revenue hearing officer determined that the gross receipts from a taxpayer’s deemed asset sale pursuant to I.R.C. § 338(h)(10), including gross receipts attributable to goodwill, could not be included in the taxpayer’s sales factor for corporate income tax apportionment purposes. The taxpayer asserted that goodwill…
By Shane Lord and Prentiss Willson
The Missouri Administrative Hearing Commission held that a telephone company’s interest income received from its parent company was passive, non-Missouri source income and thus excludible from apportionable income as nonbusiness income. The interest income at issue was related to a note between the taxpayer and its parent company pursuant…
Click here to read our July 2013 articles here on our website, or read each article by clicking on the title. If you prefer, you may also read a printable PDF version.
…
By Zachary Atkins and Douglas Mo
A California appellate court held that an ice cream maker’s property tax appeal involving an alleged failure to make an external obsolescence adjustment was subject to the “substantial evidence” standard of review. The taxpayer asserted that certain production equipment used in its novelty product lines was underutilized as a…
