By Charles Capouet and Andrew Appleby
The Washington Supreme Court held that drop shipments and sales from out-of-state are subject to the Washington business and occupation (B&O) tax even when an in-state office was not involved in placing or completing the sales. A wholesaler of electronic components and computer technology worldwide sold products through its
By Stephen Burroughs and Maria Todorova
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania recently reaffirmed its decision that Level 3’s network infrastructure services (including local dial networks, telephone numbers and modems, i.e., Internet “backbone”) sold to retail Internet service providers (ISPs) constitute non-taxable Internet access services. The Commonwealth Court previously held that the taxpayer’s facility was an
By Jessica Allen and Jonathan Feldman
The New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that a taxpayer’s receipts for consulting services should be allocated based on where the services were rendered, not where the solicitation and payment for the services occurred. The taxpayer’s non-commissioned salespeople entered into lump-sum subscription agreements with
By Elizabeth Cha and Timothy Gustafson
On October 26, 2016, the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling and determined the Department of Revenue (Department) failed to satisfy its burden of showing that the statutory apportionment formula did not fairly represent Rent-A-Center West Inc.’s (RAC) business activities in South Carolina. This case
By Douglas Upton and Andrew Appleby
The New Jersey Tax Court determined that credit card issuers must source to New Jersey all of their interest and interchange fee receipts, and half of their credit card service fees, from New Jersey accountholders. The Tax Court concluded that the Division of Taxation’s regulations required the taxpayers to
By Zachary Atkins and Open Weaver Banks
The New Jersey Tax Court held that apportioning all of a company’s income to New Jersey for corporate business tax purposes, even with the allowance of a credit for taxes paid to separate-return states, failed to fairly reflect the company’s business activities in New Jersey. The court also
By Charles Capouet and Maria Todorova
The Franklin County Circuit Court held that Netflix’s subscription-based streaming video service was not subject to Kentucky’s gross revenues tax, excise tax and school tax (telecommunications taxes) imposed on “multichannel video programming service” (MVPS). Under Kentucky law, MVPS is programming “provided by or generally considered comparable to programming provided
We are pleased to announce that our SALT practice has expanded with the recent addition of five associates: Jessica N. Allen in Sacramento, Chelsea E. Marmor and Douglas J. Upton in New York, DeAndre R. Morrow in Washington DC and Alla Raykin in Atlanta.
The group’s arrival to Sutherland’s more than 100-strong tax practice brings
For the second year, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP is delighted to join TEI’s Audit & Appeals Seminar, sponsor, and lead a full day dedicated to state and local tax controversies covering:
Sutherland is pleased to announce that Partner Carley A. Roberts has been recognized as one of the “Outstanding Women in Tax” by Tax Analysts, a leading publisher of tax news and analysis.
A group of Tax Analysts editors, reporters and board members reviewed more than 300 submissions, of which only 10 women were honored for
