By Robert Merten and Madison Barnett
The San Diego County Superior Court determined that California’s combined filing regime—which requires interstate taxpayers to use combined reporting but permits intrastate taxpayers to choose between combined or separate reporting—does not violate the US Constitution’s Commerce Clause. The court acknowledged that (1) the interstate and intrastate unitary businesses were
On January 12, 2017, the California Court of Appeal held in a published opinion that a taxpayer passively holding a 0.2 percent interest in a California-based limited liability company (CA LLC) was not “doing business” in the state for purposes of being subject to California’s franchise tax. The court reasoned as follows:
By Chelsea Marmor and Madison Barnett
The California Court of Appeal upheld Comcast’s $2.8 million franchise tax refund. The court determined that: (1) Comcast and its subsidiary QVC were not unitary, such that QVC was properly excluded from Comcast’s combined group, and (2) a termination fee Comcast received from a failed merger constitutes apportionable business
By Eric Coffill
New Oregon Gross Receipts Tax Proposal. On December 14, 2016, the group behind Measure 97 (which was defeated at the November 2016 general election), released a booklet setting forth its 2017 legislative proposals. The document includes the basic structure for a new “$100 Million Business Tax” “and is “calling on the Legislature
Sutherland is pleased to announce that Partner Carley A. Roberts has been recognized as one of the “Outstanding Women in Tax” by Tax Analysts, a leading publisher of tax news and analysis.
A group of Tax Analysts editors, reporters and board members reviewed more than 300 submissions, of which only 10 women were honored for
By Hanish Patel and Marc Simonetti
In a Chief Counsel Ruling, the California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) ruled that, for purposes of determining its sale factor, a financial information provider should source the sales of its information services based on where the taxpayer’s customer receives the benefit of the service, and not where the ultimate
By Jessica Eisenmenger and Leah Robinson
The Alabama Tax Tribunal ruled that freight charges paid by the seller but passed through on an invoice to the customer are not subject to sales tax. Alabama law exempts shipping and freight charges “paid by the purchaser” from sales tax. Chief Tax Tribunal Judge Bill Thompson ruled that such
By Olga Goldberg and Marc Simonetti
The California Superior Court struck down a regulation that imposed a de facto ban on contingent fee arrangements between businesses and consultants applying for the California Competes tax credit. The Court ruled that the regulation improperly exceeded the scope of the related statute. Ryan U.S. Tax Services, LLC v.
By Samantha Trencs and Amy Nogid
The California Board of Equalization (BOE) voted to adopt an amendment to Ca. Code Regs. tit. 18, § 1525.4, to resolve a statutory ambiguity by clarifying that a taxpayer will qualify for the partial sales and use tax exemption available for certain manufacturing and research and development equipment purchases
On December 31, 2015, the California Supreme Court closed the book on California’s Multistate Tax Compact election saga, unanimously holding that the Compact is not a binding contract among its members and the State was not bound by its provisions before the State’s repeal of the Compact in 2012.
Citing the Multistate Tax Commission’s amicus
