Minnesota issued additional guidance regarding its taxation of digital goods, which became effective July 1, 2013. For more details, view the Sales Tax Fact Sheet issued by the Department of Revenue.
January 2014
Sales Tax on Out-of-State Deliveries? Misery Is Spelled M-i-s-s-o-u-r-i
By Mary Alexander and Andrew Appleby
The Missouri Department of Revenue determined that a Missouri-based seller was required to collect and remit sales tax on sales to a Missouri-headquartered customer despite the fact that the items were shipped to the customer’s out-of-state locations. The seller fulfilled the orders by delivering the purchased items to a…
Live by the Sword: Tax Court Insists New Jersey Must Play by Its Own Rules for Throw-Out Purposes
By David Pope and Timothy Gustafson
The New Jersey Tax Court drafted a letter to the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, to amplify the Tax Court’s August 9, 2013, taxpayer-favorable decision applying New Jersey’s “Throw-Out Rule” in Lorillard Licensing Co. LLC v. Division of Taxation, Docket No. A-2033-13T1. In Lorillard, the…
Missouri Department of Revenue Concludes Sales or Rentals of Streaming Video Content Are Not Subject to Sales or Use Tax
By Zachary Atkins and Prentiss Willson
The Missouri Department of Revenue issued a letter ruling in which it determined that the sale or rental of streaming video content is not subject to Missouri sales or use tax. The service in question allowed customers to purchase or rent video content and to stream the content through…
Can I Order Catalog Storage in Indiana? Hold the Income Tax, Please
By David Pope and Andrew Appleby
The Indiana Department of Revenue determined that storage of advertising catalogs in Indiana, for a taxpayer’s out-of-state clients, did not create corporate income tax nexus for such clients. The taxpayer, located in Indiana, stored and distributed catalogs for its clients. Indiana does not define “doing business” statutorily, but the…
Compact Texas Trial Court Decision Denies MTC Three-Factor Election
By Madison Barnett and Jonathan Feldman
A Texas trial court denied a taxpayer’s claim that it was entitled to use the Multistate Tax Compact’s three-factor formula election for the Texas Margin Tax. The court’s order did not specifically address either the availability of the election or whether the tax meets the MTC’s definition of an…
Margin [Tax] Call: Texas Appellate Court Holds COGS Deduction Eligibility Determined on Combined Group Basis
By Madison Barnett and Timothy Gustafson
In the first appellate decision arising from a Texas Margin Tax audit, the Texas Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the taxpayer, holding that a combined group’s eligibility for the cost of goods sold (COGS) deduction is determined on a group-wide rather than a separate-entity basis. The Comptroller…
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Deposits Bank’s Uniformity Claim in the Recycling Bin
By Zachary Atkins and Andrew Appleby
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that treating a merger between two in-state banks differently than a merger between an in-state bank and an out-of-state bank did not violate the Uniformity Clause of the Pennsylvania Constitution. If two in-state banks merged, Pennsylvania law formerly required the combination of the banks&rsquo…
Oklahoma Letter Rulings: Sales of Digital Products, Software Maintenance Renewals and Video Game Cards Are Not Subject to Sales Tax
By Derek Takehara and Andrew Appleby
The Oklahoma Tax Commission issued three Letter Rulings addressing the digital economy. First, the Commission ruled that receipts from sales of digital photos, videos and designs delivered via the Internet are not subject to sales tax when no tangible item is conveyed. The Commission also ruled that charges for…