refund

Subscribe to refund via RSS

The long saga of Michigan’s Multistate Tax Compact election continued on Wednesday with oral argument before the Michigan Court of Appeals. A packed courtroom witnessed a 1.5 hour proceeding before an active three-judge panel. The arguments focused primarily on: (1) whether legislation can retroactively repeal the state’s adoption of the Multistate Tax Compact; (2) whether…

By Charles Capouet and Timothy Gustafson

The Supreme Court of Missouri denied a Missouri corporation’s sales tax refund claims on its sales of trade show displays shipped to out-of-state customers because it did not prove that the title to the goods transferred outside of Missouri. Missouri exempts from sales tax retail sales made in interstate…

By Stephen Burroughs and Amy Nogid

The Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, rejected the Department of Revenue’s request that rental car companies be granted only prospective relief from the court’s earlier decision which declared the car rental charge illegal. The voter-approved surcharge was enacted for the Arizona Tourism and Sports Authority to finance the…

New Jersey law contains a little-known, one-sentence provision with substantial implications for companies contesting corporate tax assessments in the New Jersey Tax Court: Filing a Tax Court complaint for one tax year causes the statute of limitations period for assessing additional tax for all subsequent open years to remain open—with no defined closing date—for any…

Upholding retroactive legislation recently enacted by the Michigan Legislature, the Michigan Court of Claims today dismissed multiple cases where taxpayers had appealed the Department of Treasury’s denial of their ability to elect three-factor apportionment under the Multistate Tax Compact.  See, i.e., Taskawa America, Inc. v. Department of Treasury, Case No. 11-000077-MT (Mich. Ct.

State Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABORs) are intended to ensure that taxpayers are treated fairly. In this edition of A Pinch of SALT, Sutherland tax attorneys Jonathan A. Feldman, Madison J. Barnett and Suzanne M. Palms explore TABORs offered by several states and the meaningful protections that they offer.
View the full article reprinted from

…

On October 2, in PPL Electric Utilities Corporation v. Director, Division of Taxation, No. 000005-2011, the New Jersey Tax Court determined that federal deductions for the taxpayer’s payments of Pennsylvania gross receipts tax and Pennsylvania capital stock tax are not subject to addback in New Jersey. As a result, taxpayers that added back those…