The Louisiana Court of Appeal reversed and remanded Bridges v. Polychim USA, Inc., No. 581,759, a case in which the trial court held that an out-of-state corporation was subject to the franchise tax by virtue of its indirect ownership interest in a general partnership doing business in Louisiana. Bridges v. Polychim USA, Inc.
New York City Legislation Enacts General Corporation Tax Reform
Posted on
Posted in New York, Policy and Legislation
On April 13, 2015, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed New York’s 2015-2016 budget legislation, which, among other changes, conforms the New York City general corporation tax to the most significant changes from last year’s New York State corporation franchise tax reform.
View the full Legal Alert.
This is Not a Joke: Federal Court to Consider Quill and Comity
Posted on
Posted in Noteworthy Cases
In the ongoing saga over Colorado’s use tax reporting laws in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ordered a full briefing on the Comity Doctrine and the Commerce Clause on April 13. The outcome of this case could have broad implications for states and taxpayers seeking…
New York Budget Incorporates More Significant Tax Changes
Posted on
Posted in New York, Policy and Legislation
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo introduced his 2015-2016 budget and accompanying legislation on January 19, 2015. After much negotiation, the Legislature just enacted the Budget Bill. As a result, New York’s tax law has been significantly altered for the second time in two years.
View the full Legal Alert.
Will New Roads Lead to Georgia Tax Reform?
Posted on
Posted in Policy and Legislation
By Stephen Burroughs and Jonathan Feldman
Georgia’s Transportation Funding Bill may lead to significant tax reform for the state in 2016. In response to a nearly $1 billion transportation budget shortfall, on March 5 the Georgia House of Representatives passed H.B. 170, which would convert Georgia’s sales tax on motor fuel to a 29.2…
Constitutional Challenges to Ohio CAT’s Bright-Line Presence Nexus Test Advance
Posted on
Posted in Digital Economy
By Stephanie Do and Madison Barnett
The Ohio Board of Tax Appeals determined that two out-of-state online retailers with no physical presence in Ohio were subject to Ohio’s Commercial Activity Tax (CAT). The Board, declining to rule on the taxpayers’ constitutional arguments, found that the online retailers met Ohio’s statutory bright-line presence nexus test based…
In a New York Minute: Six New York Tax Reform Decisions to Make in 2015
Posted on
Posted in New York, Policy and Legislation
New York’s corporate tax reform includes sweeping changes affecting nearly every aspect of its corporation franchise tax.
In their article for State Tax Notes, Sutherland Partners Leah Robinson and Marc A. Simonetti review what New York corporate taxpayers should be doing now to be ready for the state’s corporate tax reform measures that will…
You’re Gonna Have to Do More Than That: Passive Investment in California Limited Liability Company Insufficient to Meet Statutory Nexus Threshold
Posted on
Posted in California
By Evan Hamme and Timothy Gustafson
A California Superior Court held that passive membership in a limited liability company (LLC) is insufficient to meet California’s statutory “doing business” standard. In Swart Enterprises, Inc. v. California Franchise Tax Board, an Iowa corporation with no business activities or physical presence in California invested in a fund organized
…
Join Us for the Sutherland Tax Roundtable Silicon Valley
Posted on
Posted in California, Noteworthy Cases
Sutherland’s Tax Team will host the Sutherland Tax Roundtable Silicon Valley on Thursday, October 9 at the Four Seasons Hotel Silicon Valley in Palo Alto, California. The roundtable will take an in-depth look at significant state and local tax issues and developments impacting the technology sector, including:
- Tax Considerations of a Global Workforce
- Employment tax
…
Colorado Collection Confusion: Department of Revenue Addresses Application of Sales and Use Taxes to Mail Order Sales
Posted on
Posted in Noteworthy Cases
By Mary Alexander and Timothy Gustafson
The Colorado Department of Revenue determined that a mail-order seller was required to collect state and local sales tax on orders shipped to localities where it had established nexus and state use tax (and any applicable special district use tax) on all other sales shipped to customers in Colorado.