Shaking things up in state and local tax
Shaking things up in state and local tax
By Eric Tresh and Liz Cha
On April 10, 2017, a Tennessee Chancery Court ordered that the Tennessee Department of Revenue is temporarily prohibited from enforcing a regulation that requires out-of-state retailers making annual sales in excess of $500,000 to collect and remit sales tax. The Order arises out of a dispute between the Plaintiffs…
Traditionally, mandatory worldwide combined reporting was the state corporate tax issue of most concern to companies engaged in international business. States are now moving toward a water’s-edge unitary combination method for both US and foreign-based companies.
In his article for the Spring 2017 edition of Partnering Perspectives, Eversheds Sutherland (US) Senior Counsel Eric Coffill covers…
By Charles Capouet and Andrew Appleby
The Florida Department of Revenue determined that a reinsurer did not have nexus with Florida for corporate income tax purposes. The Department first asserted that an insurer or reinsurer would have nexus with Florida if it was authorized to transact business in the state. The Department also stated that…
The Georgia Tax Tribunal, in its first published decisions in more than a year, held that:
…
By Zack Atkins and Tim Gustafson
The Washington State Department of Revenue ruled that an out-of-state baker whose only in-state “presence” was its use of in-state independent commissioned sales representatives to solicit orders had substantial nexus with Washington and therefore was subject to the state’s business and occupation (B&O) tax. The taxpayer contracted with the…
By Christopher Lutz and Jeff Friedman
On December 15, 2016, the Tennessee Joint Government Operations Committee held a hearing regarding the governor’s proposal to establish an economic nexus standard for the state sales tax. Under the proposal, remote sellers would be subject to collection obligations in the state if their Tennessee sales exceed $500,000. The…
By Charles Capouet and Andrew Appleby
The Washington Supreme Court held that drop shipments and sales from out-of-state are subject to the Washington business and occupation (B&O) tax even when an in-state office was not involved in placing or completing the sales. A wholesaler of electronic components and computer technology worldwide sold products through its…
The Virginia Department of Taxation (Department) ruled that a company’s sales of cloud computing services did not create nexus with Virginia for corporate income tax purposes. The Department also said that in applying P.L. 86-272, it uses the same “solicitation” test for both the sales of intangible personal property…
By Ted Friedman and Madison Barnett
The North Carolina Court of Appeals held that it would violate Due Process to impose income tax on an out-of-state inter vivos trust because the trust lacked a sufficient connection with North Carolina. The trust was created and governed by laws outside of North Carolina, the Trustee resided outside…
By Samantha Trencs and Amy Nogid
A Washington State administrative law judge (ALJ) denied a business and occupation (B&O) tax protest from a German pharmaceutical corporation with no physical presence in the state after finding that the royalty income from products sold in Washington far exceeded Washington’s economic nexus threshold. The double taxation relief available…
