An Indiana taxpayer claimed net operation loss deductions (“NOLs”) on its adjusted gross income. The NOLs were acquired by the taxpayer as part of a corporate acquisition. The Indiana Department of Revenue did not dispute that the taxpayer was entitled to the NOLs, but limited the NOLs by an “asset ratio” based on the assets
Indiana
Indiana Enacts IRC Conformity Bill, Decouples from Certain Federal Tax Reform Provisions
On May 14, 2018, Indiana Governor Eric Holcomb signed into law H.B 1316 (the Bill). The Bill provides a number of changes to Indiana’s tax laws, including responding to provisions of the federal Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Some notable provisions of the Bill include:
- updating Indiana’s conformity to the Internal Revenue Code from January
…
Indiana DOR: “Equity” Prevents Application of Throwback Rule
By Ted Friedman and Eric Coffill
On August 30, 2017, the Indiana Department of Revenue determined that an out-of-state corporation doing business in Indiana and worldwide was entitled to a reduction of its Indiana sales factor because certain sales in foreign jurisdictions should not have been sourced to Indiana under the state’s “throwback rule.” In…
Indiana Has Quill in Its Sights
By Maria Todorova and Chris Beaudro
Effective July 1, 2017, Indiana has added an economic nexus provision to its sales tax law. Indiana Code Section 6-2.5-2-1 has been amended to provide that a retail merchant with no physical presence in Indiana must collect sales tax on its sales made into the state if the retail…
Kroger False Claims Act Lawsuit Remanded to Indiana State Court for Lack of Diversity Jurisdiction
By Dmitrii Gabrielov and Jonathan Feldman
An Indiana federal court remanded a lawsuit brought under the Indiana False Claims and Whistleblower Protection Act (False Claims Act) back to Indiana state court. The relator, Michael Harmeyer, alleges that Kroger and affiliates violated the False Claims Act by failing to collect sales tax on various items at…
Separated, But Not Separately Stated: Indiana Tax Court Holds Utility Receipts Tax Does Not Require Separate Statement of Nontaxable Receipts
By Nick Kump and Carley Roberts
The Indiana Tax Court held that the plain language of Indiana’s utility receipts tax (URT) does not require taxpayers to separately state taxable and nontaxable receipts on their returns. The URT provides that nontaxable receipts are taxable if such “receipts are not separated from the taxable receipts on the…
Heisman Would Be Proud: Taxpayer Stiff-Arms Indiana DOR with Transfer Pricing Studies
By Stephen Burroughs and Jonathan Feldman
The Indiana Tax Court granted summary judgment to Columbia Sportswear USA Corp., (“Columbia”), determining that: (1) Indiana’s alternative apportionment statute did not permit the Department to equitably adjust Columbia’s tax base; and (2) Indiana’s standard sourcing rules clearly reflected Columbia’s Indiana source income because transfer pricing studies supported Columbia’s…
Hoosier Daddy? Background Checks Not Subject to Indiana Sales Tax
By Stephen Burroughs and Charlie Kearns
The Indiana Department of Revenue (Department) concluded that a company’s employment screening and background checking services are not subject to sales tax. The company in this matter receives requests from customers seeking to verify the background, employment history or education of a potential employee or tenant. The company then…
Going Nowhere: Taxpayer Must Show Out-of-State Use of Software Licenses for Use Tax Exemption
By Mike Kerman and Charlie Kearns
The Indiana Department of Revenue (Department) found that a medical research company that purchased software licenses was entitled to an exemption from use tax for purchases of taxable computer software as long as it could show the licenses were ultimately used outside of Indiana. The Department added that an…
Royal Treatment: No Evidence that Rent-A-Center’s Intercompany Royalty Payments Distorted Indiana Income
By Mike Kerman and Madison Barnett
The Indiana Tax Court granted summary judgment to Rent-A-Center East, Inc. (RAC), finding that the Department of Revenue’s determination that RAC and two affiliates should have filed a combined return was improper. This case was on remand from a prior Indiana Supreme Court ruling (please see our prior coverage…