By Jessica Kerner and Open Weaver Banks

The South Carolina Department of Revenue determined that charges for a web-based application used to process insurance claims are the sale of a non-taxable data processing service rather than a communications service. The company providing the service collects claims information for a customer from the customer’s insurance carrier(s)

By Evan Hamme and Madison Barnett

Applying the “true object” test to software-related services, the Tennessee Department of Revenue determined in a letter ruling that optional services offered in connection with the sale of software would not be subject to sales tax, at least in some circumstances. The taxpayer in this case sells – and

By Jessie Eisenmenger and Timothy Gustafson

In a Technical Assistance Advisement, the Florida Department of Revenue determined the proper sourcing methodology for income from twelve different types of sales by an online service provider (OSP) for Florida sales factor purposes. The OSP collects data that it distributes to its customers by a variety of methods,

By Stephanie Do and Open Weaver Banks

The Indiana Department of Revenue determined that an out-of-state taxpayer improperly sourced tuition received from its Indiana students taking online learning courses on a cost of performance basis. The taxpayer provided educational services through local campus courses and online learning programs. In computing its Indiana sales factor, the

The South Carolina Supreme Court issued its decision in CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. v. S.C. Dep’t of Revenue, Opinion No. 27474 (S.C. Dec. 23, 2014), holding that the South Carolina Department of Revenue bore the burden of proof to invoke the use of an alternative apportionment method and failed to meet its