Earlier this week, the Multistate Tax Commission held its 2017 March Committee Meetings. Eversheds Sutherland Attorneys were on the scene for all committee meetings. Several interesting and enlightening items were discussed. This alert highlights key developments from the meeting, including:

  • Considerations of developing a model entity-level tax on pass-through entities;
  • The return of the Use

By Jessica Eisenmenger and Open Weaver Banks

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals for District III upheld the Tax Appeals Commission’s decision that separating dredged material from contaminated river water into its constituent parts for the purpose of water pollution remediation constitutes “processing” of tangible personal property and is therefore a taxable service. Tetra Tech EC,

Traditionally, mandatory worldwide combined reporting was the state corporate tax issue of most concern to companies engaged in international business. States are now moving toward a water’s-edge unitary combination method for both US and foreign-based companies.

In his article for the Spring 2017 edition of Partnering Perspectives, Eversheds Sutherland (US) Senior Counsel Eric Coffill covers

By Doug Upton and Madison Barnett

The Michigan Court of Appeals held that a taxpayer was precluded from recovering sales tax it voluntary paid in response to a preliminary audit determination, even though assessment of the tax may have otherwise been barred under the four-year statute of limitations. The court reasoned that a preliminary audit

In a rare special meeting on February 24, 2017, the Multistate Tax Commission (MTC) adopted amendments to the MTC’s Model General Allocation and Apportionment Regulations that it has worked on since 2014. Among other things, the 94-page Model Regulations:

  • Provide a new section related to market-based sourcing of receipts from the sale of services and

By Charles Capouet and Andrew Appleby

The Florida Department of Revenue determined that a reinsurer did not have nexus with Florida for corporate income tax purposes.  The Department first asserted that an insurer or reinsurer would have nexus with Florida if it was authorized to transact business in the state.  The Department also stated that