Noteworthy Cases

Subscribe to Noteworthy Cases via RSS

Thomas Jefferson once described jury trials as “the only anchor yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.” Jefferson would likely be disappointed by the California Supreme Court’s recent decision holding that taxpayers have no right to demand a jury trial in California income tax refund…

Recipients of qualified empire zone enterprise (QEZE) tax benefits beware: New York is reviewing your qualifications to receive a QEZE credit. On April 28, 2011, an administrative law judge upheld the Department of Taxation and Finance (Department) denial of the taxpayer’s QEZE credit claims because the taxpayer did not establish the credit for a valid business purpose. In the Matter of the Petition of Ward Lumber Co., Inc., Dkt. Nos. 823209, 823163 (N.Y. Div. Tax App. Apr. 28, 2011).

The taxpayer, Ward Lumber Co., was incurring substantial losses and appeared destined for bankruptcy. In an effort to prevent Ward Lumber, one of Essex County’s largest employers and businesses, from going under, several local officials recommended that Ward Lumber pursue QEZE credits to ease its financial difficulties. One state official told Ward Lumber that it would have to form a new entity to qualify for the QEZE program. Ward Lumber merged with a Delaware corporation in 2001, kept the original business’s name, and qualified for and received QEZE benefits for 2002 through 2004.Continue Reading New York Giveth, Taketh Away

California’s Fourth Appellate District ruled that taxpayers must include the value of intangible emissions reduction credits (ERCs) when they determine the fair market value of an independent power plant’s property. Elk Hills Power, LLC v. Bd. of Equalization, No. D056943 (May 10, 2011). Elk Hills sets a disturbing precedent regarding the taxation of intangibles…

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee recently upheld a class action lawsuit against an out-of-state law firm that the city of Memphis, Tennessee, hired to collect past-due property taxes. Wright v. Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, 2011 WL 1100462 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 22, 2011). A class of Memphis taxpayers filed…

Yesterday, the New Jersey Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the Whirlpool case. Whirlpool Properties, Inc. v. Div. of Taxation, Docket A-25-10 (N.J. Supreme Court argued May 4, 2011). Whirlpool argued that the New Jersey “Throwout Rule” is facially unconstitutional because it is designed to tax extraterritorial income. The New Jersey Throwout Rule required taxpayers…

The Washington Supreme Court recently adopted the “primary purpose of the purchaser” test to determine whether a transaction should be broken down into its component parts or considered as a whole. In Qualcomm, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, the court overturned the state court of appeals and held that a taxpayer’s vehicle tracking service was subject to buiness and occupation (B&O) tax as an information service, and not as a network telephone service. The court reasoned that the purchaser was buying an integrated management tool that happened to include data transmission, not a telephone service coupled with tracking hardware and software.Continue Reading Keep on Truckin’: Washington Supreme Court Analyzes the Primary Purpose of Vehicle Tracking Service