Digital Economy

Subscribe to Digital Economy via RSS

On December 18, 2012, the California Court of Appeal ruled that receipts from the right to replicate software are sourced as sales “other than tangible personal property.” In reversing the trial court, the Court of Appeal upheld the taxpayer’s use of costs of performance sourcing. Microsoft Corporation v. Franchise Tax Board, Case No. A131964…

The New York State Department of Taxation and Finance (Department) issued a pair of advisory opinions regarding the sales taxability of consulting services and software. New York’s Tax Law generally imposes sales and use tax on receipts for furnishing information services. N.Y. Tax Law § 1105(c)(1). However, in both advisory opinions, the primary transactions were not subject to New York sales tax because they were within the exception for personalized information services and information services provided orally. See 20 NYCRR § 527.3(b)(2) & (3).Continue Reading Software in Conjunction with Information Services: What’s Your Function?

In two reletter rulings, the Texas Comptroller’s office evaluated the sales and use taxability of certain unique web-based services. In Tex. Policy Letter Ruling 201207531L (July 31, 2012), the Comptroller’s office ruled that Internet marketplace listing fees were not subject to Texas sales and use tax; however, the provision of webstore development services were taxable data processing services.Continue Reading The Lone Star State Swings the Lasso Around E-Commerce Services

While most states that have “click-through nexus” sales tax laws have issued little to no guidance addressing the scope of their provisions, the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue (Department) issued guidance explaining the types of payment mechanisms that will trigger nexus.

The Department’s ruling supplements a December 1, 2011 Tax Bulletin (Tax Bull. 2011-01)…

The Virginia Tax Commissioner concluded in two recent rulings that a reseller of mobile telephone services is not a “telephone company” for purposes of the Virginia Business, Professional and Occupational License (BPOL) tax and therefore is not subject to the higher BPOL tax rate levied against telephone companies. Va. Dept. of Taxation, Pub. Doc. Nos. 12-182 & 12-183 (Nov. 13, 2012). The taxpayer, a limited partnership, is not licensed by the FCC or the state regulatory agency, though its two partners are licensed by the FCC.Continue Reading Virginia Commissioner: Reseller of Mobile Telephone Services Not a “Telephone Company”

The Missouri Department of Revenue (Department) issued guidance stating that gift certificates sold below face value by a radio station, which are redeemable for goods and services purchased at local retailers, are not subject to sales tax. Although the primary determination is not noteworthy, the private letter ruling further stated that the retailers receiving the…

On October 16, 2012, the Virginia Department of Taxation issued two identical determinations in which it found cable set-top boxes (a/k/a “converters”) exempt from the Business Tangible Personal Property (BTPP) tax (Ruling Nos. PD 12-162 and PD 12-163). Intangible personal property generally is exempt from the BTPP tax. Section 58.1-1101 of the Virginia Code classifies certain…

We hope you will join us on November 13-14 at the Bloomberg BNA Tax Policy and Practice Summit in Washington, D.C. Sutherland is pleased to sponsor the Summit and to offer our clients and friends a $200 discount off the Summit registration fee.

The Summit is perfectly timed to provide insights into the tax implications…

Iowa and Kansas recently issued rulings regarding the taxability of cloud-based software applications and online training services. While the conclusions reached by both states—that the services are not taxable—are generally the same, the reasoning relied upon by each department of revenue illustrates the ongoing uncertainty of applying state sales and use tax laws to cloud computing services.

The Iowa Department of Revenue (IDOR) looked to the state’s statutory authority and acknowledged that the taxability of “cloud computing has not been expressly addressed by the Iowa Code.” Nonetheless, the IDOR determined that the sale of hosted software is not taxable because the Iowa Code provides that a “taxable ‘sale’ of tangible personal property does not occur if the substance of the transaction is delivered to the purchaser digitally, electronically, or by utilizing cable, radio waves, microwaves, satellites, or fiber optics.” I.C. § 423.3(67). Likewise, the IDOR considered web-based training to be nontaxable because “software training” is not an enumerated service under the Iowa Code.Continue Reading Iowa and Kansas: Remote Access to Software is Not Taxable . . . Or Is It?